- Nomura to partner with China Asset Management in Connectivity Scheme
- Mastercard redefines choice at checkout with acquisition of Vyze
- Federal Reserve fines UniCredit for unsafe and unsound practices related to inadequate sanctions controls
- Credit Suisse to take controlling stake in its China securities joint venture
- Interac evolves beyond debit cards to cater to emerging digital payment landscape, says GlobalData
- NatWest to use biometric payment approval for all business payments
- UniCredit joins Plug and Play to discover new innovative solutions for the Group and clients expired
- Grass is greener for environmentally friendly businesses, finds Barclays expired
- Credit Kudos raises £2.2m in latest round of funding expired
- Customer engagement key differentiator for banks as total redress payments increase expired
- BNY Mellon publishes mixed results for Q1 2019 expired
- KeyCorp Q1 results reflect solid underlying trends in core businesses expired
12th April 2019
FCA fines Standard Chartered Bank for poor AML controls
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Standard Chartered Bank £102,163,200 for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) breaches in two higher-risk areas of its business. This is the second largest financial penalty for AML controls failings ever imposed by the FCA.
The announcement follows FCA investigations into two areas of Standard Chartered’s business identified by the bank as higher risk: its UK Wholesale Bank Correspondent Banking business and its branches in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The FCA found serious and sustained shortcomings in Standard Chartered’s AML controls relating to customer due diligence and ongoing monitoring. Standard Chartered failed to establish and maintain risk-sensitive policies and procedures, and failed to ensure its UAE branches applied UK equivalent AML and counter-terrorist financing controls.
The FCA found significant shortcomings in Standard Chartered’s own internal assessments of the adequacy of its AML controls, its approach towards identifying and mitigating material money laundering risks and its escalation of money laundering risks. These failings exposed Standard Chartered to the risk of breaching sanctions and increased the risk of Standard Chartered receiving and/or laundering the proceeds of crime.
Standard Chartered’s failings occurred in its UK Correspondent Banking business during the period from November 2010 to July 2013 and in its UAE branches during the period from November 2009 to December 2014. US authorities have now also taken action against the Standard Chartered group for significant violations of US sanctions laws and regulations.
Mark Steward, Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said: “Standard Chartered’s oversight of its financial crime controls was narrow, slow and reactive. These breaches are especially serious because they occurred against a backdrop of heightened awareness within the broader, global community, as well as within the bank, and after receiving specific attention from the FCA, US agencies and other global bodies about these risks.
“Standard Chartered is working to improve its AML controls to ensure all issues are fully addressed on a global basis. The FCA has taken into account Standard Chartered’s remediation work and its cooperation in assisting the FCA investigation, without which today’s financial penalty would have been even higher.”
The FCA has worked alongside a number of authorities during this investigation. Acknowledging the international co-operation in this case Mr Steward said: “The FCA has worked closely and extensively with a number of UK and overseas agencies including the US Department of Justice, New York County District Attorney, US Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, New York State Department of Financial Services and US Office of Foreign Assets Control. I would also like to acknowledge the assistance of the UAE Central Bank whose commitment has demonstrated the fight against money laundering is a truly global one, as it needs to be.”
Standard Chartered did not dispute the FCA’s findings and exercised its right, under the FCA’s partly contested case process, to ask the FCA’s Regulatory Decisions Committee to assess the appropriate level of sanction. Standard Chartered’s agreement to accept the FCA’s findings meant it qualified for a 30 per cent discount. Otherwise, the FCA would have imposed a financial penalty of £145,947,500.