- Swiss Re Institute estimates global insured catastrophe losses of $31bn in first half-mostly from secondary perils
- Swiss Re issue sigma headed "Machine intelligence in insurance: insights for end-to-end enterprise transformation"
- Lloyd's Lab selects ten new InsurTechs for fifth cohort focused on COVID-19 risks
- Marsh reports global average commercial insurance prices increased 19% in second quarter
- Prudential plc highlights resilient Asia operating profit-to separate Jackson in US
- Berkshire Hathaway boosts insurance underwriting earnings
- Ageas chooses SSP Intuition solution expired
- Duck Creek launches IPO expired
- InsurTech Sprout.ai releases claim settlement solution for health insurers globally, utilising Contextual AI expired
- CII and IAL work with University of Bolton to launch MBA in Islamic Finance expired
- MGA Fiducia to provide businesses across the UK with the ability to protect their premises and staff against the threat of Nuclear, Biological, Chemical and Radiological(NBCR) terrorism expired
- Third Point Re and Sirius Group to combine expired
29th July 2020
Insurance Europe warns EC against its proposals to introduce a new definition of “sustainability preferences” across the delegated acts of MiFID II, the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD) and Solvency II
A group of financial sector associations–including Insurance Europe–has written to the European Commission to warn against its proposals to introduce a new definition of “sustainability preferences” across the delegated acts of MiFID II, the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD) and Solvency II.
While supporting the Commission’s aim of creating a strong framework for investment that supports the transition to sustainability, insurers have serious concerns that these proposals, as currently drafted, will, in fact, restrict customers’ access to sustainable finance by unduly limiting the range of products that insurers are able to offer them.
The issue is that, while the Commission’s proposal for the definition of sustainability preferences is based on the product categories under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), it adds extra criteria–regarding adverse impacts and sustainable investment criteria–for products that promote sustainable characteristics, but that do not necessarily have a sustainability objective.
This would result in a group of sustainable products that would comply with the stringent requirements of the SFDR, but that cannot be offered to a customer who expresses a desire for a sustainable product due to the additional criteria the Commission is proposing.
Therefore, these newly proposed requirements on eligible products are inconsistent with the SFDR’s objectives and should be removed. Otherwise, they would hamper the ability of the financial sector to offer products that support and accelerate the transition to a more sustainable economy.
Insurance Europe Trends(236 articles)
Solvency II Trends(1,741 mentions in Insurance Newslink)